The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case as to the gist of the grounds of appeal was erroneous or erroneous by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

Furthermore, even if the facts charged are found guilty, the sentencing of the lower court (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, such as a recording recording of the detailed and clear statement of L which was involved in the dispute process between D and G, such as interfering with the exercise of G lien according to D’s instructions, as the head of the public relations office of the hospital in which D’s judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles was actually operated, and recording of the contents of the Defendant’s detained interview with D, etc., the Defendant may be sufficiently recognized as having proved the above

This part of the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

B. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s perjury on the assertion of unfair sentencing results in a lack of influence on the outcome of the trial, or that the Defendant has no criminal history, perjury requires strict punishment as an offense that leads to the foundation of the judicial system for the discovery of substantial truth, despite the evident evidence, the Defendant’s denial of the crime despite the evident evidence, and the fact that the Defendant did not oppose the crime, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments, such as the contents of the Defendant’s testimony, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.