logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.25 2018나2029175
임대차보증금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On December 10, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the instant building owned by Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) with Defendant B, and concluded a lease agreement on the instant building Nos. 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 207, and 208 (hereinafter referred to as “instant building No. 1”). At that time, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant C on the instant building No. 304, 305, 310, and 311 (hereinafter referred to as “instant building No. 2”) and operated the instant building No. 1 and 2.

Upon the termination of each of the above lease terms, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B on January 19, 2017, with the following terms: (a) KRW 200,000,000 for the instant building; (b) KRW 26,000 for the monthly rent (excluding value-added tax and management expenses; and conditions for advance payment for one year rent); and (c) from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2018 for the instant building (hereinafter referred to as “instant first lease agreement”); and (d) entered into the lease agreement with Defendant C as to the instant building (hereinafter referred to as “the instant lease agreement”) from February 1, 2017 to February 31, 2018; (b) KRW 100,000 for the instant building; (c) KRW 6,000,00 for the following rent (excluding value-added tax and management expenses; and (d) KRW 1 year rent); and (e) the lease agreement from February 1, 2017 to January 201.

Under the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff paid KRW 200,000,000 to Defendant B, and KRW 100,000,000 to Defendant C, respectively, but the rent for one year that the said Defendants agreed to pay in advance was not paid respectively.

In the process of removing the plaintiff's promotional materials, etc., the plaintiff attached one promotional material (scale 3 x 4 m) to the glass of the commercial building of this case, and installed 10 advertising materials (scale 1 m x 3 m) on the entrance entrance to the entrance.

. The commercial building of this case

arrow