logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.06.25 2012고정4344
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A The fine of KRW 5,00,000, the fine of KRW 2,000,000, the fine of KRW 3,000,00, and the fine of KRW 3,00,00, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner who operates commercial sex acts in the trade name of "E" with approximately approximately approximately 83.37 square meters of the second floor of the D Building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter "E"), and Defendant B is the head of the management office of the above business establishment, and Defendant C is the person who directly sells sex at the above business establishment.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B had Defendant B take charge of the management of the above business establishment and guidance of customers. Defendant B received KRW 90,000 from male customers G who found the above E on May 31, 2012 and gave studio guidance, and let the above C do sexual intercourse with G.

Accordingly, Defendant A and B conspired to arrange sexual traffic.

2. Defendant C received KRW 90,000 per hour from G who was found to be a customer on May 31, 2012, and received KRW 90,000 per hour and provided a single sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, Defendant C was engaged in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the seventh trial date);

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field mining inspections;

1. A and B of the relevant criminal facts, and the choice of punishment: Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

2. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

3. Confiscation Defendant A and B: No. 1 of the evidence seized under the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic is 10,000 won per annum, and No. 2 of the evidence is 13,000 won per annum. The money and valuables acquired from the offense charged by the Defendant A and B is 90,000 won per annum, and it cannot be specified which of the above seized articles is the price for sexual traffic paid by G. Thus, the above seized articles must be confiscated.

4. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow