1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

. 3. Determination

A. If the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the evidence Nos. 28, 29, 30, and 31, the plaintiff can recognize the fact that the plaintiff supplied the original amount equivalent to KRW 178,097,590 as listed below to the defendant. Since the defendant paid KRW 165,408,290 out of the above amount to the plaintiff, the fact that the defendant paid KRW 165,400 to the defendant is the plaintiff, the amount of the original amount unpaid by the defendant is KRW 12,689,30 (= KRW 178,097,590 - KRW 165,408,290).

The supply period of 10, 290, 30.2, 10, 29, 20.1, 30, 10, 205, 20, 30, 205, 20, 10, 29, 205, 20, 30, 10, 205, 20, 30, 205, 20, 10, 205, 30, 205, 20, 10, 205, 30, 205, 20, 205, 30, 10, 205, 20, 205, 206, 30, 105, 205, 206, 30, 105, 205, 25, 204, 205, 205, 2015.

** The plaintiff asserts that it is the cost of supply as of December 2010, and the defendant asserts that it is part of the cost of supply as of December 3, 2010, but it seems that it has been paid the cost of supply as of December 2010, as followed.

In this regard, the defendant defenses that the above 12,689,300 won was fully repaid, and therefore, the health belt and the evidence corresponding thereto are included in the statement Nos. 24-1, 2, and 4 (each statement about D). However, the defendant's representative director unilaterally stated the statement.