logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원해남지원 2020.09.23 2020가합3264
청구이의
Text

Gwangju District Court Decision 2020JJ245 dated 245 against the plaintiffs (appointed parties) and designated parties.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Where both the Plaintiff (designated parties, hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and the Appointed D, E, and F (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) are referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”, the heir of the deceased C (Death on December 2, 2005, hereinafter “the deceased”).

B. The Deceased borrowed money on nine occasions from June 8, 2001 to September 30, 2004 (hereinafter “each of the instant loans”) from the G Association (hereinafter “G Association”) and H Association (hereinafter “H Association”) upon receipt of a credit guarantee certificate from the Defendant, and the G Association and H Association (hereinafter “G Association”) as follows. As the Deceased lost the benefit of time, the Defendant subrogated the obligation to the G Association, etc. as follows:

On June 8, 2001. 6,50,000,024,095 December 26, 2001. 26,80,80,000,000,30,000,072,072,013, 24 May 24, 2004; 60,60,00,26,246,246,9744, 121,70,760,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

C. On January 9, 2013, the Plaintiff et al. filed a qualified acceptance report on the deceased’s inheritance with the Gwangju Family Court’s 2013-Madan5, and the said court accepted the Plaintiff et al.’s report on February 18, 2013.

The defendant against the plaintiff et al. at the Gwangju District Court 2009Guj1126

An application for a payment order seeking payment of the total amount of subrogated payment 36,343,113, and damages for delay as stated in section 1, 2, and 3 of the subrogated payment amount, was filed, and the above payment order became final and conclusive as it was because the Plaintiff et al. did not raise an objection to the payment order.

(Final Date: Plaintiffs D. 1, 2009, Sep. 19, 2009, 19, 2009, E., and F. ( October 1, 2009)

The defendant is above D.

order of payment as described in paragraph (1).

arrow