1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a car in the E-land.

On May 2, 2014, at around 08:17, the Defendant driven the above van and proceeded at the speed of 50 to 60km from the gambling distance, which is located in the 299 (Training dong) of Yeonsu-gu Incheon, along with the three-lane road in front of the Taeyeong apartment.

Since there is a yellow solid line at the center of the road, in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke while driving a stroke, and was faced with the part of the victim F (33 years old)'s Gamburged on the left side of the said passenger vehicle, which was driven by the said center line, with the upper part of the above stroke on the left side of the said stroke.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury of the victim F, such as cutting the framework of a single flive bones, other than the first flive body, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment to the victim F, the injury of the victim H (the victim, the victim, the victim, the 31 years old), such as acute pressure emitting 1st century, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment, and the injury of the victim B (the victim, the 41 years old), who is the passenger of the above flive vehicle, for approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment to the victim B (the flives, the 45 years old), for approximately 2,3,4th, 4th, 5 weeks of medical treatment to the victim I (the flives, the flives of the flives of the flive body, and the injury of the victim's J (the 32 years old), such as the drupture of the flive body.

B. After causing a traffic accident as seen above, the Defendant did not see whether the Defendant, who was the passenger on the part of the Defendant driving, was able to see whether the Defendant was able to drive the salking and to deal with the insurance.