1. The Defendants jointly and severally enter the Plaintiffs in the column of “claimed Amount” list of claims by Plaintiff and Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant GS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant GS”) (hereinafter “Defendant GS”) had been established on March 10, 2015 and had been engaged in liquor sales business and restaurant operation, etc., offered non-guaranteed bonds of KRW 332,40,000 via GU (hereinafter “instant bonds”) to the online small-value investment broker from February 2018.

The Plaintiffs, via GU, are private creditors who purchased each of the bonds of this case in the amount indicated in the column of “investment amount” in the list of claims by Plaintiff and Plaintiff from Defendant GU.

B. The instant bonds were issued on March 28, 2019, the maturity date, 7% interest per annum from the date of issuance of the principal, 7% interest per annum from the date of issuance of the bonds to the date of maturity, and additional interest under the following table due to the sales of Defendant GS.

Where Defendant GS fails to pay the delayed damages due to the due date, the highest interest rate out of the overdue loan interest rates in commercial banks located in Seoul shall be applied to the overdue loan rates in Seoul from the following day to the date of full payment, but where the above highest interest rate exceeds the bond interest rate, the bond interest rate shall be applied.

The highest interest rate among the overdue loan interest rates of commercial banks located in Seoul is 15% per annum.

(c)

On November 30, 2018, the Defendant GTS and its subsidiaries concluded a contract on business rights and asset acquisition (hereinafter “instant contract”) with Defendant GTS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant GTS”) to transfer “GW three business rights, assets, entire assets, delegation and employment relationship of executives and employees, and other rights and obligations relationship” to Defendant GTS.

(d)

After Defendant GT acquired the main office and red store of GW Newdong, which is a restaurant operated by Defendant GS, it continued its business in the same place without changing the existing trade name so far.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 14 (which has a number) shall be each number.