The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable when considering the fact that the Defendant both recognized the instant crime and is against their depth, and that the instant crime was committed to maintain the basic livelihood.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, ① each of the crimes of this case has been committed repeatedly by deceiving many and unspecified persons for a period of less than three months using the Internet, and the quality of the crime is inferior. ② The victim from each of the crimes of this case has exceeded 40, and the total amount of money acquired exceeds 13,00,000,00 won, and there is no effort to recover damage, and some of the victims want to punish the defendant. ③ The defendant has the same criminal history (4 times before the actual criminal history). The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime for not less than six months, and the execution of the punishment has been completed for not more than one month, and it was found that the defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case for a repeated crime for which the punishment of this case has not been completed, ④ The defendant appears to have committed each of the crimes of this case, such as gambling funds, and thus, it appears that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant's new punishment of this case has been committed without any justifiable or similar circumstances to reflect the defendant's punishment.

3. Conclusion.