1. The decision of the court of first instance, including the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court, is as follows.

1. Facts that there is no dispute over the details and result of appraisal of the ruling (based on recognition), Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 4 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the first instance court's entrustment of appraisal to Gap, the result of appraisal of this court's appraiser D, the result of fact inquiry of this court's appraiser D, the purport of whole pleadings;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Business approval and public announcement - Business approval and public announcement - Business approval of the housing site development project for the ignite-2 zone: Defendant: the public announcement of the designation of the area subject to housing site development for the Fireproof-2 zone No. 2007-601, Dec. 20, 2007, public notification of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (No. 2008-308, Jul. 11, 2008) announced on July 11, 2008;

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on February 22, 2013 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) is the same.

- Subject to accommodation: Cheongdong-si, Cheongdo-ri 401-52 2,741 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2.

In addition, the machinery facilities, etc. in the above factory are referred to as "in the case".

- Compensation for loss: 6,794,851,920 won in a lump sum - Date of expropriation: April 17, 2013 - An appraisal corporation: Central Appraisal Corporation and Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter collectively referred to as "adjudication Appraiser"), and the results of appraisal by an appraisal appraiser are as follows:

C. The result of the commission of appraisal to A by an appraiser A of the first instance court is referred to as “the first instance court appraiser”, and the result of the commission of appraisal is referred to as “the first instance court appraiser”.

- As to the appraisal of the obstacles of this case, the expert witness of the first instance court shall be the C professor of the B University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation (hereinafter referred to as “expert witness of the first instance court”).

The results of the service of the supplementary expert witness are as follows, and the results of the service of the supplementary expert witness are as follows, and the results of the service of the supplementary expert witness were derived based on the results of the service of the supplementary expert witness.

- Contents of appraisal: the following table1: