logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.08 2016고합273
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for seven years, for six years, for six years, and for four years, for defendant D, respectively.

Defendant

C, E, F.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016Gohap273, 360] - Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant A”) (hereinafter “Defendant A”) (“Defendant A”) (“Defendant A”) was charged with each fraud relating to the number 1 to 22 of the annexed Table Nos. 2016dahap273, and each fraud relating to the number 23 through 29 times was charged respectively under 2016Gahap360) [207] - Defendant B [2016Gohap30] - Defendant A (“Defendant D”) is the head of the above Company AE building, AF representative director of the company, Defendant B, who is a golf membership trading company with 1406 head of the company, and Defendant D is the head of the above Company A, who has used the name of the chairman of the above Company, and is the father, EF (name AG), and H is the business operator of the above Company, and the head of the company office who mainly takes charge of entry of a golf membership in the above company G.

Defendants are running a golf membership trading brokerage business under the name of a personal business entity called “AH (representative: D)” and completed the company’s continuous registration on October 1, 2015.

(A) On October 1, 2015, the written indictment stated the same as the above company was established, but the above company constitutes a case where the company continues to exist in the state of dissolution, and thus, the facts constituting the crime related thereto are modified. AF decided to succeed to approximately KRW 1.5 billion to the debt of AH at the time of the above company’s continuation. From that point of view, the Defendants were using the money in the name of golf membership purchaser as funds for the purchase of golf membership membership in the past, such as using the money received from golf membership purchaser as funds for the purchase of golf membership membership from other buyers who already requested the purchase of golf membership. The Defendants were in the situation where the business proprietor accumulated and the operating expenses of the

As such, even if the Defendants received the purchase price from the golf membership purchaser, they did not have the intent or ability to intermediate the transaction, they obtain money from the victims as the purchase price by securing the golf membership products from the victims and making false statements as if they were to intermediate the purchase of golf membership.

arrow