The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

(2) On September 14, 2010, the Defendant and his defense counsel repeatedly committed each of the crimes of this case after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years on the grounds of embezzlement on September 14, 2010, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and motive and circumstance during the period of the suspended sentence of 2 years on September 14, 2010, since the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court is unreasonable, it is not deemed that the Defendant’s assertion on this part is without merit, and thus, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.