Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, this judgment is delivered to the defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on March 26, 1996. A

Around August 201, the Defendant parked in the vicinity of the Hoamamba-dong, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, with B and once sexual intercourse.

B. Around January 2012, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with B, which was operated by the Defendant who is in the “F” in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

C. Around 11:00 on January 21, 2013, the Defendant, at the I lodging room located in H in the Chungcheong City operated by B, had a sexual intercourse with B once. D.

The defendant from February 4, 2013 to the same year.

2. Until June 2, 200, B and I met with B three times at the I accommodation located in H in Chungcheongnam-si operated by B.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant was aware that he was a spouse of the above A, and the date, time, place, as described in paragraph (1), and the foregoing six times sexual intercourses with A, respectively.

B. Around March 11, 2013, the Defendant prepared a written application for coal against A at the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and submitted it to the Cheongju District Public Prosecutor’s Cheong-si, which is located in the Cheong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Cheong-si, Cheong-si.

The contents of the written application were "A was forced to commit sexual assault several times."

Around March 15, 2013, the Defendant stated that “In the process of receiving supplementary questions about the contents of the above written application from the prosecutor at the prosecutor’s office No. 209 of the same public prosecutor’s office, the prosecutor “it was true that the Defendant had sexual intercourses with A several times from January 2013 to February 2013, and all of its sexual intercourses was raped by assault or intimidation of A. Therefore, it is not a simple way. Therefore, the purpose of submitting the written application for coal is to investigate and punish A as it changed from punishment for rape, and to punish A as rape.” On March 26, 2013, the Defendant stated that “A is punished because it was rape,” to the prosecutor again at the same prosecutor’s office at the same public prosecutor’s office at the same time.”

However, in fact, the defendant and A had sacrifies with each other, and A did not have raped the defendant by assault or intimidation.

Accordingly, the defendant A.