1. The plaintiff's medical records and opinions with respect to the defendant C and D are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff C, .

1. The following facts may be acknowledged either as a dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings.

Since the plaintiff suffered a traffic accident in 197, the plaintiff has been receiving medical treatment.

B. Around September 24, 2003, Defendant B, the Plaintiff’s mother, requested the Plaintiff’s hospitalized treatment to the E Hospital Health division located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, where Defendant C was the director of the medical care center. Defendant C hospitalized the Plaintiff on the same day and prepared a record of the duty of the Plaintiff until November 21, 2003.

C. Since then, Defendant C retired from the hospital, and Defendant D, the director of the Hychi Medical Center for the case of the E Hospital, issued a written opinion on the Plaintiff’s status at Defendant B’s request on December 15, 2005. However, Defendant D did not directly examine the Plaintiff, but issued the written opinion on the basis of the duty record prepared and prepared by Defendant C.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On September 24, 2003, Defendant B captured the Plaintiff on September 24, 2003, led the Plaintiff to an E hospital, and caused Defendant C to detain the Plaintiff by making a false statement as if he had a mental illness with the Plaintiff. Defendant C was hospitalized and detained without properly diagnosing the Plaintiff, and Defendant D issued the Plaintiff’s opinion to the Plaintiff without any reasonable ground, without directly diagnosing the Plaintiff. The Defendants asserted that, as consolation money for mental damage suffered by the Plaintiff due to the aforementioned tort, Defendant B claimed KRW 3 million, Defendant C, and D, respectively, and damages for delay.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff also claims that the Plaintiff’s mandatory records against the Plaintiff from September 24, 2003 to November 21, 2003, prepared by Defendant C, and that the Plaintiff’s opinion as to the Plaintiff on December 15, 2005, issued by Defendant D, be null and void.

(b) Judgment on the claim for payment of money A.