The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, while operating a “Dcafeteria” in the Gansi District C, indicated the country of origin by falsely indicating the origin as “kimchi (domestic)” at the central column of the establishment, while purchasing a total of 110 km in China from September 3, 2014 to February 4, 2015, in the E “E” and providing customers with the same.

2. The Defendant’s assertion asserts that, apart from domestic culture-related kimchi as indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant purchased domestic industry-related kimchi and provided it as bottom-hand. Of course, Chinese culture-related kimchi was used only as a spoke material, and as to Chinese culture-related kimchi used as a spoke material in accordance with the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products (hereinafter “Enforcement Decree”), it does not constitute an offense since it does not have an obligation to indicate the country of origin.

3. The judgment prosecutor argues that the act of violation is established since it is included in the concept of reflective consent under the Enforcement Decree, even though he/she used the Chinese culture culture culture culture culture culture as only the domestic culture culture culture culture culture as well as the Chinese culture culture culture culture in Korea as an independent anti-com in light of the form of custody of Chinese culture culture culture culture culture.

According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor on whether China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's China's Chinak Kim (10kg) as of February 11, 2015, the defendant was in custody at the time of crackdown around 15:00. However, the following circumstances revealed according to the records, namely, ① the defendant has been continuously supplied with domestic distribution from September 2014 to February 2015, ② the defendant was in custody at the time when the defendant's control, ② the defendant was in custody of one Korean country's Chinese Chinese country's Chinese countryk Kim's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's Chinese country's China'