logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.11.20 2020고단2844
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from an employee of the Singinging Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting Ting that “on the receipt of cash by moving to a place designated by the Defendant; and (b) received a deposit account with a designated account; and (c) accepted the proposal to serve as a so-called “passing” to deposit the money received under the direction of a person without his name in return for the deposit.

1. On July 24, 2019, the victim B, who was unaware of the victim’s name of fraud, made a false statement to the effect that “In order to obtain a loan, the victim would have deposited the loan repayment due to the repayment of the existing loan,” by misrepresenting the victim’s staff by telephone.

However, in fact, the name-oriented person was not an employee of the financial institution, and there was no intention or ability to provide loans to the victim.

On the same day of 10:25 on the same day, a person who was unable to use his name was transferred KRW 10 million from the victim to the E-Union account (F) in the name of D.

At around 11:00 on the same day, the Defendant moved to the G of the Gyeongbuk-gun in accordance with the direction of the person who was unable to receive his name, and received cash KRW 10 million from D and deposited it into the account designated by the person who was unable to receive his name.

Accordingly, the Defendant aided and aided the criminal act of fraud by the personnel using name phishing assistance.

2. On July 24, 2019, the victim H made a false statement to the effect that “Around July 24, 2019, the victim misrepresented his/her employees by telephone to the effect that “a person who intends to obtain a loan would have deposited the repayment of the loan due to the repayment of the existing loan.”

However, in fact, the name-oriented person was not an employee of the financial institution, and there was no intention or ability to provide loans to the victim.

On the same day as 14:10,000 won was remitted from the victim to the E Association account (F) in the name of D at around 14:10.

The defendant shall be I, at around 15:03 on the same day, in accordance with the direction of a person who has not been killed in his name.

arrow