1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant B’s KRW 147,722,354 and as to this:

B. The above case is jointly and severally with the defendant B.

The money set forth in the subsection.

1. The description of the grounds for the change in the specification of the claim;

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, as to the claims against defendant A and C, the facts as to the grounds of the changed claim (the plaintiff has claims against the network D, and the defendant A and C have received an inheritance, acceptance, report, acceptance, and adjudication on inheritance in inheritance as the heir of the network D) can be acknowledged. Thus, the plaintiff's claims against defendant A and C have merit.

(b) Against Defendant B: Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)