Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a resident living in B apartment 26 dong 1503 in the East Sea.

At around 18:40 on September 25, 2013, the Defendant discovered that the victim C(63 years of age) working as security guards turn on the interior of the corridor, etc. at the 1st floor, B apartment 26 - 2 - - 2 - 2 - in the East Sea in the East Sea on September 25, 2013, and fladding a test cost, saying, “I am dead because I had done so at once, but did not do so, because I did not do so.”

The victim suffered bodily injury such as the impairment of the 2nd head of the upper 2 week cryp, the cryp of the cryp, the base of the cryp, the base of the cryp, the base of the cryp, the base of the cryp, the base of the cryp, the base of the cryp.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The statement made under C in the police interrogation protocol (second time) of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense, even if C did not have any fact at all when she was the victim in the process of avoiding the victim’s assault, even if she did so, the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense.

Witness

C According to C’s legal statement, the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant (second-time), etc., as acknowledged in the above criminal facts, the victim is faced with drinking by the Defendant, as if acknowledged in the above criminal facts.

It is recognized that the defendant exceeded the floor and thereafter, the victim's face and shoulder part can be taken by drinking, thereby causing an injury requiring two weeks of treatment, and it is difficult to view such defendant's act as self-defense.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion.