logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.08 2017노6131
화장품법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged despite the fact that the Defendant participated in labeling or advertising as indicated in the judgment below.

2. Examining the judgment below in light of the circumstances such as the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor, in particular, the grounds for supporting the prosecutor's appeal, and the fact that the defendant does not have any direct evidence to acknowledge the fact that the defendant participated in labeling or advertising as stated in the judgment below, the court below's judgment on not guilty of the facts charged is sufficiently acceptable, and there is an error of law by mistake

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow