logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단6789
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2014, at around 23:30 on September 23, 2014, the Defendant discovered that the victim E (here, 48 years of age) sits together with his frying and drinking together with his frying and drinking to force force by force.

The Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim by inserting his hand to the victim's knife with his own knife with his knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement statement made to E;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (the fact that a person commits an offense and reflects it, and the fact that he/she has no past record of the punishment);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Where this judgment becomes final and conclusive to file for the registration and submission of personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to a provisional payment order, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and is obligated to submit personal information to the head of the

However, an order for disclosure or notification of registered information needs to be carefully and carefully given that it may have a significant impact on the defendant, and in this case, it is determined that there are special circumstances that may not disclose personal information, such as that the registration of personal information alone appears to have an effect to prevent recidivism by the defendant. Thus, it does not issue an order for disclosure or notification of registered information.

arrow