The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the decision-making defendant led to the crime of this case, led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, actively cooperated with the arrest of the investigative agency, and that the defendant's will take the lead to the defendant, and that the defendant's wife wants to take the action.

However, it is not unreasonable that the court below's punishment is too inappropriate in light of all the conditions of sentencing including the Defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., including the fact that the medication of narcotics causes serious harm to the society and the state's soundness due to its toxicity, and recidivism during the period of repeated crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, "1. The result of the confinement of prisoners" is corrected to add "the summary of evidence" to "the summary of the judgment of the court below."

.