logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.04.29 2019고단1242
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In using and managing a means of access, no one shall conduct any act of providing, demanding or promising compensation, except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s “2018.......” in the facts charged in 2019, appears to be Orala, and, on February 2, 2019, extended the credit rating by means of repeatedly accumulating the physical card to the account under the name of the suspect and repeatedly accumulating the transaction performance.

"A" accepted the proposal and sent it to Kwikset Service Articles, which had been sent by the third secretary on the mutual incomprehion in the vicinity of Sam-dong, Sam-dong, Jeon-dong, the title of the Ckwikset Service Articles, which was linked to the Account under the name of the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant promised to provide a means of access in return for an intangible expectation interest that can receive future loans, and lent it to a person who has not been named.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of transactions, list of accounts, and accounts;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 49 (4) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (Selection of Fine) concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act that is disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing: The circumstances in which the means of access leased by the accused was used for the crimes of Bosing: the primary offender, reflectivity, the fact that the accused does not have any profit from the crime, and all other factors of sentencing shall be determined as the same as the disposition.

arrow