A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a ecoo vehicle B.

1. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance. On February 16, 2020, the Defendant operated a cub motor vehicle B at the D-ray Intersection in front of the D-ray in Syang City around February 16, 2020 without mandatory insurance.

2. On February 16, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Defendant driving the said Eccuss Vehicle on February 16, 2020, driving the said Eccuss Vehicle at the speed of speed from E to F.

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to live well in a clean mind and to safely drive motor vehicles while maintaining a safe distance between motor vehicles.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving a stroke while maintaining a safe distance without neglecting this, and was driven by the victim G (Nam, 53 years old) who was driving in the same direction at the mastheading bank in the front part of the H rocketing taxi and the front part of the eroke car.

Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) by occupational negligence, inflicted bodily injury on the victim G and taxi passengers I (n and 18 years old); (b) upon the victim J (Nam, 18 years old); and (c) upon the victim J (Nam, 18 years old); (d) upon the victim of taxi, the victim of the taxi, who did not have an open room for approximately two weeks of treatment; and (e) escaped without immediately stopping the said taxi to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though he/she destroyed the said taxi vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 633,279.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. The actual condition survey report, the mandatory insurance association, and each;