logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2016.07.18 2016고합10
공직선거법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the president of the North Korean District before the organization of D, registered as a preliminary candidate for the 20th National Assembly E, F, and G constituency H political party in the 20th National Assembly E, F, and G area, and was elected to the J Council member in 209 with the I who resigned from

No one shall make contributions or have another person make contributions to an election for a person who intends to be a candidate, and no one shall make an election campaign by means of a meeting of a party, debate, native folks meeting, alumni meeting, alumni meeting, or other assemblies, except as otherwise prescribed by the Election of Public Officials Act, prior to the election campaign period.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 18:30 on January 13, 2016, introduced I to the effect that “the four National Assembly members of the Republic of Korea have drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, and drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, drawed, and drawed, and drawed, during the preparation for the National Assembly members of the Republic of Korea after getting off and back to Korea, I would like to promote I’s achievements such as transfer of draw, etc. among approximately 2 hours of approximately 1 hour and about 20 minutes during which the above gathering was in progress, and provided them with food, food, food, R, draw, e., e., 300 won, and T market value.

As a result, the defendant made a contribution to the 20th National Assembly member election for I who want to be a candidate, and carried out an election campaign before the election campaign period.

2. It is true that the first preliminary candidate was found in the instant gathering organized by the Defendant and the defense counsel, and the Defendant paid the meal cost.

However, there is no fact that the Defendant did not allow I to attend the instant meeting, and there is no fact that the Defendant carried out an election campaign by requesting members of the D organization to support I in the course of the instant meeting.

In addition, this case.

arrow