logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단4551
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. On September 17, 2015, the Defendant’s insultd on September 23:31, 2015, the “M” as indicated in the written indictment of the victim F, a police officer assigned to the Seodong Police Station E box of the Sungdong Police Station E box called out after receiving the 112 report that there was a dispute prior to the ‘D cafeteria’ in Osan City, O” is obvious that the “F”

에게 “위 아래로 뭘 꼬라 보냐. 경찰 씨발. 저년이 씨발 아우”라고 G 등이 있는 가운데 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

B. The Defendant is obstruction of the performance of official duties.

It is clear that “M” as stated in the foregoing F Bill is a clerical error in F, at the time, at the same time, and at the place, such as paragraph (1).

When hearing the talk that the Defendant did not take a bath, the Defendant 1 was fluent by hand at once, and the Defendant 1’s chest, who was a policeman belonging to the same police box that was next to the police box, was tightly pushed the Defendant 1’s chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of order.

2. On September 17, 2015, Defendant A assaulted Defendant A’s right kneek, on the left side, on the ground that the Defendant’s children were arrested as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties to the chief of the police box affiliated with the police box of the Seodong-dong Police Station, which was called out after having been reported 112 by Defendant’s children.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding L;

1. Each police statement made to J, F, H, I, and K;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts A: Defendant B of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: The Defendants have no record of having been sentenced to punishment exceeding the same kind of fine and fine, and commit a crime of drinking alcohol and contingently.

arrow