1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is deemed legitimate even if this court submitted the statements in the evidence No. 9-18 submitted in the court of first instance and the testimony of witness D in the court of first instance were neglected.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, and it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the deletion of 7-1 to 7-14 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is excluded from the object of the judgment of this court. Thus, it is cited as it is by the main text

The ERP system of 2nd 15th 15th eth eth eth eth e.g. “ERP system” shall be modified to “Enterri Respathn, Co. resource management.”

The 4th 11th 11th 11th 201 of the judgment of the first instance stated “the reason for resignation was stated as a recommendation resignation” to the effect that “the date on December 31, 2014, in which the reason for resignation was stated as a recommendation resignation.”

The fourth 14-party 14-party 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended to "the witness of the court of first instance".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.