Cases
209dward93582 Divorce, etc.
Plaintiff
A male who has been born in 69 years;
Seoul Address
reference domicile Gyeong-nam
72 Women of age 72
Seoul Address
reference domicile Gyeong-nam
Special Representative 000
Principal of the case
202 No. 2002
Conclusion of Pleadings
March 3, 2010
Imposition of Judgment
March 17, 2010
Text
1. The plaintiff and the defendant are divorced.
2. The plaintiff shall be designated as a person with parental authority and a custodian for the principal of the case.
3. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.
Purport of claim
The order is as set forth in the text.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Marriage and children of the plaintiff and the defendant: Marriage report on December 8, 2001, and children are the principal of the case.
B. The failure of marriage: The defendant's childbirth on July 14, 2002, when the defendant gives birth to the principal of the case, was placed in a state of "vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative ve
[Grounds for Recognition] : Each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including branch numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings;
A. Part on the claim for divorce
According to the above facts, the defendant has been absent from the state of plant for more than seven years, and the defendant's parents agree to divorce between the plaintiff and the defendant, so it seems difficult to maintain the marital relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant, which constitutes grounds for divorce under Article 840 subparagraph 6 of the Civil Code.
B. Part of the claim for designation of person with parental authority and custodian
Considering the process of marital life and the reason why the failure was caused, the period of marital life, the age of the principal of the case, and the fact that the defendant is currently a plant in the present situation, the designation of the plaintiff as a person with parental authority and custodian for the principal of the case is appropriate for the smooth growth and welfare of the principal of the case. Thus, the plaintiff is designated as a person with parental authority and custodian for the principal of the case.
3. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for divorce is accepted on the ground of the reason, and the designation of a person with parental authority and a person with custody shall be decided as per Disposition.
Judges
Judges Kang Jong-ok