logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울가정법원 2010.3.17.선고 2009드단93582 판결
이혼등
Cases

209dward93582 Divorce, etc.

Plaintiff

A male who has been born in 69 years;

Seoul Address

reference domicile Gyeong-nam

72 Women of age 72

Seoul Address

reference domicile Gyeong-nam

Special Representative 000

Principal of the case

202 No. 2002

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 3, 2010

Imposition of Judgment

March 17, 2010

Text

1. The plaintiff and the defendant are divorced.

2. The plaintiff shall be designated as a person with parental authority and a custodian for the principal of the case.

3. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim

The order is as set forth in the text.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Marriage and children of the plaintiff and the defendant: Marriage report on December 8, 2001, and children are the principal of the case.

B. The failure of marriage: The defendant's childbirth on July 14, 2002, when the defendant gives birth to the principal of the case, was placed in a state of "vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative vegetative ve

[Grounds for Recognition] : Each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including branch numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. Part on the claim for divorce

According to the above facts, the defendant has been absent from the state of plant for more than seven years, and the defendant's parents agree to divorce between the plaintiff and the defendant, so it seems difficult to maintain the marital relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant, which constitutes grounds for divorce under Article 840 subparagraph 6 of the Civil Code.

B. Part of the claim for designation of person with parental authority and custodian

Considering the process of marital life and the reason why the failure was caused, the period of marital life, the age of the principal of the case, and the fact that the defendant is currently a plant in the present situation, the designation of the plaintiff as a person with parental authority and custodian for the principal of the case is appropriate for the smooth growth and welfare of the principal of the case. Thus, the plaintiff is designated as a person with parental authority and custodian for the principal of the case.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for divorce is accepted on the ground of the reason, and the designation of a person with parental authority and a person with custody shall be decided as per Disposition.

Judges

Judges Kang Jong-ok

arrow