1. As to the crimes of Nos. 1, 2, and 3 in the judgment of Defendant A, four years of imprisonment, and as to the crimes of No. 3-B and No. 4 in the judgment of Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. and three years of suspended execution on March 22, 2013, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on March 22, 2013. On April 21, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of suspended execution on September 8, 201.

"2012 Highest 2078"

1. Defendant A’s fraud

A. The Defendant, in relation to land sale and purchase, purchased real estate without any means to procure business funds other than the method of resale of real estate or offering real estate as collateral, and concluded a sales contract for real estate without any funds for sale and purchase, and recruited people to purchase the real estate, thereby acquiring full ownership of real estate without any means to acquire money in the name of the purchase price of real estate.

On September 6, 2006, the Defendant sold RP forest to Q for KRW 268,880,000,000 to the victim Q in the P Authorized Broker Office located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si (O), and the Defendant had already purchased 33 lots, such as the said RR forest, from S, and has already paid the down payment and intermediate payment, the registration of ownership transfer can be completed as soon as the purchase price is paid.

In addition, a building permit shall be granted to enable the housing to be all of the above forest land and will be made before the ownership thereof.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, TJ was designated from November 1, 2002 as the land transaction permission area of Gwangju City. Since the land transaction permission area of this case was divided below the area subject to land transaction permission on May 13, 2004, after the land transaction permission area was designated, the land transaction permission between S and the defendant was required to register the transfer of ownership of the said forest because the land transaction contract between S and the defendant constitutes the first sale of the land less than the area subject to permission after the land transaction permission area was designated.