All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the Defendants’ appeal grounds (unfair sentencing) and the fact that victims E expressed their intent not to be punished against the Defendants, etc., the lower court’s respective sentence that sentenced Defendant A to the community service order for two and eight years of suspended execution in October and the community service order for Defendant B for two and eight hours of suspended execution in June and the community service order for two and eight years of suspended execution in June is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below revealed that the defendants' act of this case committed the crime of this case was committed two times as follows; the defendants found that the victim Eul was on their own side while eating at a restaurant and found them together, and it was stolen; the defendant Gap used the credit card in the above victim in an illegal manner while drinking alcohol at the defendant Eul and the main points; the defendant Gap was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on May 7, 2009 due to the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (fugitive vehicles) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and there was no record of criminal punishment, such as a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) on February 8, 2012, two times, and there was no record of criminal punishment, such as the defendants' age, character, environment, motive, degree of damage, etc.; the defendant's assertion that the above defendant's punishment was not imposed after considering all of the circumstances and circumstances after the appeal are without merit.

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.