The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the wife of the victim C, was living separately due to the conflict between the victim and the couple for about seven years, and found the E restaurant operated by the victim in the Gu around 11:05 on January 10, 2016, and considered that the victim was living together with his/her female employees, and that the victim was living together with his/her female employees, and that more than four and 6 of the table table, which is the victim's possession, were moved into a complex and a two studs on the floor, and damaged property of 1180,000 won in total of the incidental market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (the crime of this case is committed by the defendant who is his spouse, and the degree of damage is severe and the victim does not appear in this court and is punished against the defendant;

The statement, the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine, etc.