The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (a year and six months imprisonment, and a surcharge of KRW 900,000) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects the mistake, and that the defendant actively cooperatedd in the investigation of narcotics with the intent of the defendant's summary.

However, the crime of this case is not limited to the administration of philophones by the defendant, but it is not good to form the quality of the crime, the amount of philophones provided for the crime is not large, the defendant has the same criminal record, and the crime of this case is highly likely to be punished as repeating the crime without being aware of the fact that the defendant was in the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, and other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the cooperation in the investigation of the accomplice E submitted in the trial, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.