The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On August 11, 2008, the Defendant entered into a check contract with a branch office in Korea under the name of the representative director, and entered into a check transaction with the branch office in the bank bank. On October 1, 2009, the Defendant issued one copy of the check with the issue date in the name of the bank operating committee D on October 1, 2009, the face value of which is KRW 140,000,000,000, in the name of the bank operating committee for the settlement of accounts (the check E) and issued it to the non-consigner, and issued it to the non-consigner on February 26, 201, the Defendant applied the first 20,000,000 won for the issuance date of the check to KRW 150,00,000,000, and issued it to F on February 26, 201, and then issued the bill of amendment to the bill of amendment to the bill.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted by this Court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

1) On August 11, 2008, the LAD entered into a contract for current account transaction with the branch offices of the Bank potential, and prepared and issued the basic requirements for the check, such as the date of issuance, face value, etc. on the check paper of this case. Since the date of issuance, face value, etc. of the check of this case were corrected over several times, the entry and form of the check of this case attached to the charge book alone cannot be confirmed as the first accurate date of issuance and face value.

2) Upon G’s request in the latter half of 2008, the Defendant lent one promissory note with a face value of KRW 800 million in the name of the Bank of Korea, G borrowed the said promissory note from F as security, but the said KRW 800 million has been extended notwithstanding the repeated payment period.