Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for ten months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On November 15, 2018, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced four months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on November 23, 2018.

Defendant

A is a person who provides so-called so-called "private services", such as good offices or services, and Defendant B was aware of the intention that he/she has received and operated, and the introduction of the letter that he/she can accept to Defendant A and made a request for consulting.

1. C Private Coin, Ltd.: (a) around 2015, the Defendants decided to jointly acquire and operate private rains in the fifth and sixth stories of the building D, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, by designating 50% of their respective shares; (b) the Defendants were in a situation in which the said private rains or acquisition funds cannot be provided; (c) the Defendants were in a situation in which it was impossible to acquire and operate them; (d) the victims E who deliver massages are scheduled to receive and operate them normally, and (e) the Defendants conspired to raise funds by raising the acquisition fund by holding the right to operate them with the massage on the face of the State.

On May 6, 2015, the Defendants concluded that “the Defendant Ye or F is expected to purchase this letter at the level of KRW 18-1.9 billion to the victim at the construction site of the above C private house or the construction site of the Defendant B. This letter would be good for the use of this letter. There are many people. If the Defendants want to install the massage in this letter and operate from July 15, 2015 to the open date, the deposit will be changed to KRW 10 million. The deposit will be refunded upon termination of the contract or termination of the business.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have to receive money from the victims because they did not want to engage in the same service as the victims, and did not have to pay 18-1.9 billion won to the Defendant, as above, and there was no fact that the Defendant or F did not have to pay 18-1.9 billion won to the Defendant. In addition, around April 2015, the Defendant was in a bidding with the said private letter or the seller, and the National Tax Service was seized due to the default of taxes on the said private letter or the building.