The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months) of the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the crime related to narcotics is a crime that causes the degradation of individuals, homes, and society; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for having committed the same kind of crime; (c) the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the suspension of the execution of the execution of the sentence; (d) the response to the training of phiphonephones was confirmed as a result of sculphical evaluation; and (e) the Defendant attempted to administer phiphones with others through Internet hosting; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, and the details of the instant crime, it is difficult to deem that the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.