(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.05.01 2013고단263

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.05.01 2013고단263

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CR car.

1. Around 23:00 on January 9, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car and driven the two-lane road in front of the Sungnam Integrated Athletic Complex in the Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si along two-lanes from the center of Jungwon-gu to the center.

At night and at the front of that time, the victim D(54 years of age) was driven by the Ero body taxi in front of that time, and thus, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the upper defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and instead received the part behind the right side of the said Libery in front of the left side of the said Libery.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, sustained injury to the victim, such as light salt, etc. requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the said taxi to bring about considerable amount of KRW 617,00,00 for repair expenses, and escaped without taking measures, such as stopping the taxi and providing relief to the victim.

2. On January 9, 2013, the Defendant continued to drive the said car at around 23:10, and continued to drive a two-lane road from the center to the middle-gu office of the Central Road of the Republic of Korea in the same Dong.

At night and at the front of that time, the G Mart car driven by the victim F (the age of 37) stops in the air signal, and thus, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front line and the operation system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received by negligence the left-hand-hand part of the said car from the lower-hand side of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant is owned by the above victim by occupational negligence.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.09.09 2015고단546

-서울남부지방법원 2015.09.03 2015고단3015

-광주지방법원 2013.04.11 2012고단6668

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.12.21 2015고단665

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.09.15 2014고단990