The judgment below

Of them, the part of the defendant's case against the defendant A (including the part not guilty in the grounds) and the defendant B.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) on the Defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “Defendant”) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B (1) misunderstanding of facts in the judgment of the court below

(a).

As stated in the facts constituting the crime of this subsection, the defendant entices the victim N who is a minor.

The court below did not induce or induce the other party to the act of purchasing sex to become the other party to the act of purchasing sex, and held a knife knife as stated in the judgment of the court below [2013 Ma313] of the court below, but held the defendant's mother in mind that the defendant's mother will contact with the defendant's mother, and did not possess it for the purpose of committing the crime, but the court below found the defendant guilty of all of the facts of the crime. The court below erred by misapprehending

(2) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment for a maximum term of two years) is too unreasonable.

C. (1) Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Kidnapping and inducement) against the Defendants by the prosecutor (1) and 1-A of the facts charged.

Considering that the N is a disabled person with intellectual disability 2, the Defendants conspiredd to compel the victim to engage in commercial sex acts and forced the victim to pay for commercial sex acts from the victim.

Since this part of the facts charged is found guilty, the court below rendered a not guilty verdict on this part of the facts charged, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts.

(B) Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Coercive Act, etc.) against the Defendants - Article 1-b of the facts charged.

The defendants forced the victim N to engage in sexual traffic, and the victim's refusal to do sexual traffic seems to have expressed his or her desire to do so, so "the defendant conspired to do so by violence or intimidation, so the victim is a child or juvenile victim.