logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.02.09 2016고정777
폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 14, 2016, around 16:05, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant at one time at the time, on the ground that the Defendant stated that he was the victim C(79 years of age) of 14-gil, Nam-gu, Namdong-gu, Namcheon-gu, 19, and that she was the victim C(79 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement concerning C in a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which statements made by the police in D are recorded;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that a person injured by the reason for sentencing of the defendant, the defendant wants to punish the defendant by committing violent crimes (one time of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, five times of fines, one time of the suspended sentence of imprisonment), ten times (one time of the suspended sentence of the fine, seven times of the suspended sentence of the fine, one time of the suspended sentence of the fine, one time of the suspended sentence of the punishment of the penal detention), and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine after around 2007; on the other hand, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine after around 207; the defendant is aged and physically disabled; the defendant is an aged and physically disabled person of the third degree; the defendant's age, sexual behavior, and environment, as well as other various sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments of this case.

arrow