1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The party status A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “A”) was a construction company that constructed D apartment units (it consists of 260 households and ancillary welfare facilities of five apartment units of underground floors, 15 floors above the ground; hereinafter referred to as “instant apartment units”) in the Incheon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seodong, Changdong, and Seohee-dong, Incheon Free Economic Zone 18m2 (hereinafter referred to as “Cheongbu District”) and was appointed as the representative director at the time of the commencement of the rehabilitation procedure on August 9, 2012 after being decided to commence the rehabilitation procedure under the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012 Ma141, and the Defendants Co., Ltd. (formerly changed the title of the company; hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Seo-dong Construction”); the Defendants Co., Ltd. and the Defendants Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Co., Ltd.”), as of the commencement of the rehabilitation procedure between the Defendants Co., Ltd and the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Co., Ltd.”).

(hereinafter the first buyer and the first buyer are not specifically distinguished from those who have acquired the status of the sales contract). (b)

Around 202, the development plan of the Cheongra District was established and the contents of the development plan was established and made by the government around Incheon, Busan, and Gwangju. A master plan for the dong-based state of the Republic of Korea, which was made by the Republic of Korea from the center of the east Asia, was established on December 30, 2002. The Act on Designation and Management of Free Economic Zones was enacted on December 30, 2002, and the said Act was designated and cancelled.