1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff cited the scope of this court’s trial and the judgment of the court of first instance, against the Defendant, filed a claim against the Defendant for revocation of the disposition of removal and the disposition of imposition of surcharges of KRW 600,000 against the Plaintiff. The court of first instance dismissed the part seeking revocation of the disposition of imposition of surcharges of KRW 600,000,000, and accepted only the claim against removal

In this regard, the part of the claim for revocation of the disposition of imposing the above disciplinary surcharge of KRW 600,000 as the plaintiff did not appeal is excluded from the scope of this court's trial.

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance as to the removal of the case from office is just and the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit, and it is so dismissed as per Disposition.