logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.08.08 2013고정1148
근로기준법위반등
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is the C representative located in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, who is a user who used four regular workers to conduct the Crdracing operations. A.

The defendant from January 16, 2012 to the same year in the above workplace.

2. D’s wage of KRW 2,00,00 on February 2, 2013, which worked until February 28, 2013, including four (8,926,520, the petitioner, as stated in the attached Form, did not pay each of the wages within 14 (14) days after retirement without agreement between the parties on extension of the due date.

B. The Defendant did not pay KRW 34,791,830 in total, 34,791,830, including D’s retirement pay 1,353,420, who worked from January 16, 2012 to February 28, 2013 at the same place of business, within 14 days after retirement without an agreement between the parties on extension of the due date, as stated in the separate sheet.

Judgment

Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow