A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven a b bargaining car under the influence of alcohol of about 0.150% in a section of about 1km from the front day of the fluence car in the U.S. in the U.S. Haju-si to the front day of the 78-9 U.S. at the same time.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles B;

The Defendant, at the time and time set forth in the above paragraph 1., driven the said car under the influence of alcohol and proceeded from the right side of the upper university to the right side of the U.S. railway.

At that time, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as keeping a safe distance to avoid a stop of the said car, inasmuch as the Defendant had followed the FM5 car by driving the victim E (the age of 49) prior to the same direction. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as ensuring a safe distance to avoid a stop of the said car.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected to do so and stopped at the front section of the above SM5 vehicle which was driven by the Defendant without taking necessary measures such as aiding and abetting the victim, the Defendant is driving the vehicle as “G SM5 vehicle parking lot” in the vicinity of the above SM5 vehicle without taking necessary measures. In order to find out that the said SM5 vehicle was driven by the Defendant, and to escape again, the Defendant was driving the vehicle again without taking necessary measures.

In the end, the defendant is suffering from approximately two weeks of medical care due to occupational negligence, which did not drive normally while under the influence of alcohol.