Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the vehicle B at low price.

On December 1, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car on December 1, 2017, while driving the said car, which led to D's front road in C at the eth of the Eup/Myeon.

At the time, it was difficult to keep the center around the night, so in this case, there was a duty of care to safely check the front and the left and the right of the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim E (the age of 68) crossing the road from the left side of the direction of the defendant's course to the right side by negligence, and received the victim as the front part of the passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim by occupational negligence as a result, such as a dives sect, etc. at the scene.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the report on the occurrence of traffic accidents, the actual condition investigation report, each photograph, the body autopsy report, and the autopsy report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Optional to Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines

2. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the detention in the workhouse is that the Defendant caused the victim to die by occupational negligence as stated in its reasoning, and thus, the illegality thereof is small.

However, there is a confession that the defendant's mistake is divided and led to a mistake, the defendant paid 30,000,000 won to his bereaved family members as criminal agreement, the victim's bereaved family members do not want the punishment of the defendant, the above car operated by the defendant is covered by the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance, the defendant does not have any criminal punishment other than fine two times, and the defendant does not have any criminal punishment other than fine, and other arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc.