beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be jointly and severally with the plaintiff 220,761,181 won and 44,162,041 won among them, from April 26, 2004 to April 26, 2005.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Credit Guarantee Fund brought an action against the Defendant, B, etc. for reimbursement, etc.
(C) On July 1, 2009, the court below held that the defendant corporation Gap and Eul jointly and severally paid 220,761,181 won to the plaintiff and 44,162,041 won from April 26, 2004 to May 31, 2005; 18% per annum for the defendant corporation from June 1, 2005 to February 17, 2009; 20% per annum for the defendant corporation from June 4, 2009 to February 4, 2009; 176, 312, 415 won per annum from the next day to the date of full payment; and 20% per annum for the defendant corporation from June 3 to 2004 to May 31, 2005 to the date of full payment; and 20% per annum for the defendant corporation from June 3, 2004 to the date of full payment.
(hereinafter referred to as “pre-trial judgment”). (b)
On June 30, 2015, the Credit Guarantee Fund transferred its claim for reimbursement according to the preceding judgment to the Plaintiff, and notified the Defendant of the transfer of the claim on July 7, 2015.
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry (including paper numbers) in Gap 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is jointly and severally with B to pay 220,761,181 won and 44,162,041 won to the plaintiff who is the transferee of the claim for indemnity pursuant to the preceding judgment, 18% per annum from April 26, 2004 to May 31, 2005; 20% per annum from the next day to September 30, 2015; 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment; 176,312,415 won per annum from June 3, 2004 to May 31, 2005; and 20% per annum from the next day to September 30, 2015 to the day of full payment; and 15% per annum delay from the next day to the day of full payment.
Although the defendant was served with the original copy of the payment order and raised an objection, the above written objection only contains the purport of objection against the payment order, and it only addresses the plaintiff's claim.