logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.14 2017가단5221757
수수료반환 청구
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall pay to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 34,362,99 and its payment from August 25, 2017.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.

Basic Facts

On August 19, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant, an enterprise mediating overseas employment immigration, under which the Plaintiff applied for employment visa (EW3) in the U.S. and requested employment visa to the Defendant, and agreed as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”). Article 3

1.A (referring to the plaintiff)" shall pay to "B (referred to the defendant)" good offices fees necessary for the arrangement of employment immigration at the following speed stages:

Provided, That the amount equivalent to the won currency due to the transfer exchange rate (exchange rate at the time of remittance) on the date of payment shall be paid or paid to US dollars.

1) Domestic good offices commission: 90,000 won (including value-added 90,000 won) and foreign good offices fee: US$39,000 -1: contract deposit (US$13,000,990) within seven days at the time of the contract - 2: US$13,000 - 30 days after the issuance of the permit or the receipt of the notice of the employment permit; and 13,000 - 13,000 after the receipt or notification of the permit, “B” shall either refund the down payment (US$13,009,000) to “A” or re-grant the fee without additional cost. In the event of the refusal of the labor permit, “in any case of any domestic or foreign good offices” shall be valid after the final rejection of the labor permit. “In any case of the waiver of the permit for employment” shall not be deemed to constitute “in any case of the waiver of the permit for employment” under the following paragraph.

arrow