The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant was notified by the victim B and the sports dance club of the fact that she did not return to the victim for more than two years; and (b) the horseer was notified by the victim.

At around 03:00 on March 26, 2013, the Defendant requested the victim to continue to meet the victim’s home in front of the Plaintiff’s home located in the Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant sent the victim’s Handphone to the victim’s Handphone, “A school is going to 9:30 minutes of the victim’s handphone,” and “A school is going to go to the victim’s husband and his family,” and expressed the victim’s husband and his family members to have the victim divorced.

2. The facts charged in the judgment above is an offense falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 283(3) of the same Act.

However, according to the statement of “written application for non-prosecution of punishment,” which was bound in the trial records, the victim B withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on May 14, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.