A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of fraud is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:00 on December 28, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business for about one hour, including the following: (a) around one-hour 1 hour:00, the Defendant: (b) caused the victim by spiting down the brush, f, under the victim’s name “F” operated by the victim D in Suwon-si, to demand that the victim pay the food cost to the Defendant; and (c) caused the victim to interfere with the victim’s restaurant business for about one hour, such as the booming of the Republic of Korea’s public interest, f.o.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D's legal statement;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the portion of not guilty of imprisonment with labor

1. On December 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) conspired with the “F” and the “E-cafeteria operated by the Victim D in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to pay the purchase price to the victim; (b) one of the two-way stations; (c) one of the two-way stations; (d) one of the two-way stations; and (e) four of the small-party stations, as if the Defendant were to pay the purchase price to the victim.

However, the defendant and the above F have no intention or ability to pay the price even if they receive food from the victim because they did not possess cash or means of settlement under water.

Nevertheless, the defendant, in collusion with the above F, had been provided with a piracy equivalent to 23,00 won at the market price by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant asserts that there was no intention from the investigative agency to the court of this law, and that there was no criminal intent for fraud, and that there was no criminal intent for fraud, since one-person F, who is the Defendant’s one-way drinking, only drinks the other.

In other words, the following circumstances recognized by the investigated evidence, namely, the one-person F and the accused, after completing meals, "F will leave the resident registration certificate because it does not have money."