logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.03.21 2017고단7199
병역법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall injure his body or use a fraudulent act for the purpose of evading military service of "2017 Highest 7199" (Defendant A) or having military service reduced or exempted.

The Defendant, through news articles, SNS, etc., knew that the BMI index (the method of measuring the quantity of a local area using physical quality index, kidy and body body) can be judged as a class 4 social service personnel for physical parts, etc., and sentenced to the determination of social service personnel by reducing part of body weight.

Defendant was enlisted in active service on February 24, 2015; around 179cm in height; 65km and BMF index 20.2; around February 24, 2015, the Defendant was enlisted in active service on the basis of the 60km and BMF index 18.5; however, around October 17, 2016, the Defendant purchased crypt drugs for 30 days in length, (2 times a day) using the crypt drugs, such as Madro pulule, Madro pule, Nobbule, Madule, and Madule, which were 15cm in the Military Manpower Administration on the basis of measuring the volume of meals, but the Defendant was subject to reduction of the volume of meals from around 16, 2015 to 16,000 in the area of 15cm in the region by measuring the volume of meals.

On December 19, 2016, the Defendant was found to have undergone a physical examination again conducted by the Ganinman Regional Military Manpower Administration on December 19, 2016 and was judged to be a social service personnel of Grade IV in physical parts, which was measured at 181.8 cm, 5.7 km and BMI index 16.8.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged his body and committed a fraudulent act for the purpose of having military service reduced or exempted.

around 03:00 on November 15, 2017, the Defendants planned that Defendant A left the Gelter’s e-mail card, which Defendant A was placed in the Gelter in e-mail F, with respect to Defendant B’s e-mail card, and that Defendant B would have withdrawn and divided cash from the card, after Defendant B received the e-mail as one’s card.

arrow