(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.03 2015가합45591

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.03 2015가합45591

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 131,652,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from November 9, 2014 to November 3, 2016.

Reasons

B. On November 9, 2014, F, a driving engineer, moved to a place indicated as “PPcar” in the attached Form No. 11, in order to perform a concrete building work on the second floor of the new building in accordance with the direction of the construction division of the construction division of the field management office of the instant construction project at around November 11, 2014.

2) On the other hand, F is the current status map of accidents in attached Form 2 (hereinafter “ current status map”) to the director of the construction division of the on-site management office for concrete snow removal work.

(3) On November 9, 2014, G had the operation of the instant PC located in the place indicated as Crain in the current situation map around 1:30 on November 9, 2014, while moving the PC, it was requested to move the said PC to another PC (a concrete structure in the form of manufacturing and assembling the parts of the building). The employees of the KOUG directed the operator of the instant PC to move the said PC to another PC. In accordance with the foregoing direction, G had the operation of the instant PC located in the instant PC to *2, while moving the PC to 3rd PC (hereinafter “instant PC”). As a result, G had the operation of the instant PC to move the PC located in the said PC to *2, while moving to the said PC, it was shocked to 4,5 parts connected to the boom boom at issue (hereinafter “the instant boom”).

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 6 and 7, each entry and video of Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 5, video of Eul evidence 5, witness F and G testimony

2. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire arguments on the evidence held earlier, the instant accident occurred due to G’s negligence, which failed to perform the duty of care necessary for the operation and work of the mid-term season as an engineer of the instant mid-term season.

(1) G shall be an operator of the instant mid-term skills, who needs qualifications as a mid-term driver technician, at the time of operation.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2015.12.10 2014가단222071

-대전지방법원 2020.12.16 2017가단202286

-부산지방법원 2017.08.25 2016가단322823

-수원지방법원안산지원 2015.02.17 2013가단14590

-대구지방법원김천지원 2014.04.09 2012가단3810