logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고단2505
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"The 2015 Highest 2505 Highest 2505 Highest 2, C, the Defendant, and D are willing to operate the illegal game room, and B came to play an overall role in managing the game room and providing funds necessary for the operation of the game room, C was willing to play an role in exchanging customers with money, and D was willing to play an role in viewing customers' remaining frightness and a network outside the game room in preparation for crackdown.

1. Violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry - A, C, Defendant, and D, as seen above, conspireds to provide game products for the use of game products that were not classified by the Game Rating Board’s meeting on June 1, 201, and provided for the use of the game products for the use of the game products that were not classified by the game product Rating Board’s meeting, even though no one provided the game products for the use by the game product rating Board’s meeting on June 1, 201.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc., Violation of the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry - Exchange B, C, Defendant, and D conspired with the foregoing, with 20 game machines at the same time and place as the foregoing, and had them enter the game money into the game by allowing them to use the accumulation card.

The above sea open game was carried out in the form of a sun game, and the points are raised by the pre-determined multiple factors according to the results of the character such as garment and fry by chance, and 10% of the above game was set for fee and the remaining points were exchanged in cash.

As a result, B, C, Defendant, and D conspired as above and exchanged points obtained through the use of game products for business purposes, while engaging in speculative activities that cause property gains or losses to users according to the outcome of friendship by the above methods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.The police of F. F.

arrow