A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Suwon Franchising Station, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 4, 201. On October 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Cheongju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2015.

[2] The Defendant, in collusion with C, purchased a vehicle under the name of a person who is entitled to receive an installment loan from D, etc. on the ground of his/her purchase of the vehicle under the name of the person who is entitled to obtain an installment loan from D, etc., and divided sales allowances, and the contract for installment loan and the purchase of the vehicle is

It is common sense that C has attempted to acquire the pecuniary profits equivalent to the loan by introducing the commercial and installment loans for the second and second class trading company.

On March 8, 2013, the Defendant, along with C, will cancel the vehicle sales contract and installment loan contract on the following day or transfer the name of another person to D when purchasing a heavy vehicle with D through D at the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government ES shop on March 8, 2013, and share sales fees to D.

“A false statement to the effect that it is “ shall require the victim to obtain a loan of KRW 27 million from the Hyundai Capital to purchase a single car of KRW 27 million at the market price, and then purchase the said loan under the name of the victim for the said loan, and received the said car from the victim.

However, in fact, even if the defendant had the victim receive the above installment loan and let him purchase the second installment, he did not have any intention to cancel the loan and the second installment purchase contract and to release the installment from the obligation.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 27 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. The witness C’s partial statement 1.