Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:10 on October 4, 2012, the Defendants: (a) under the influence of alcohol at the main point of “F” located in Heung-gu, Young-gu; (b) the Defendants were to extract cash from the president of the main point of “F” and to follow alcohol to female employees; and (c) he was flowed from the victim G (the age of 43) and the victim H (the age of 38) who was on the table table that the Defendants followed the Defendant’s breath; and (c) the Defendant b was skeing the Defendant’s breath of the Victim H’s bat.

As such, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim G, such as the 14-day salt, tension, etc., on the part of the victim G, and on the part of the victim H about 10-day base and tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. A report on investigation (violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and joint violence);

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. Ctv and explanatory note at the site of violence incidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the punishment of crimes;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants and defense counsel asserted that they did not inflict any injury on the victims, and the Defendants’ act constituted self-defense because they did not constitute the victim’s attack, as stated in the judgment of the court, and therefore, the Defendants’ act constitutes self-defense. Thus, according to each of the above evidence, the Defendants can be acknowledged as having jointly committed an injury to the victims as stated in the judgment, and the above Defendants’ act is not a mere defense but a self-defense. Thus, the above Defendants’ act constitutes self-defense.